Sinatra Family Forum
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks for bumping this thread
The thing about this set that is special as has been well documented in this thread is that so much of the material had not been released in album form before. And it didn't simply cover FS's hits. It went deeper. But then as Bernhard states it came out at the same time as the two greatest hits Columbia albums so since they took care of the hits this album was free to focus on the less known material. I wonder how the other Columbia release from this time fits into this theme. That would be "Frank Sinatra in Hollywood 1943-1949". I do not see it in the album section of this forum so I just ran up stairs and found my copy. The liner notes are dated 10/2/68. So take the Essentials set, the two greatest hits albums and throw in the Hollywood set and one can see that Columbia was busy repackaging their Sinatra material much to the satisfaction of record buyers like me (and the other senior members of this forum). Larry Last edited by lorenzotedesco; 02-03-2009 at 04:57 AM. |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Another related Columbia issue a few years later, October 25, 1972, was In The Beginning 1943–1951, which was a repackaging of the two Greatest Hits, The Early Years volumes. |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
I recall that in the '80's, the Essential set was considered a rare item and commanded some premium prices before many of those songs found their way onto cd. While the packaging and the contents are very special, the sound quality of many of the songs is not what is available now. In fact, I recall one review of the album that said some of the songs sounded as though they'd been recorded through a wad of Kleenex.
The Frank Sinatra in Hollywood album, on the other hand, was my first experience at hearing the early Sinatra with true clarity. Someone paid attention to more than the packaging on this one. Once I get a cartridge for the old turntable, I'll see if I still feel that strongly about this set. As far as the fake stereo on some of these '60's releases, Columbia's version was (thankfully) pretty mild compared to the echo chamber effect you get on the Capitol versions. |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
DON'T DESPAIR |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nancy, we're talking about the 1969 Columbia LP in this thread, not the later day CD box set that Chuck produced.
|
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I should have used more of the quote.
__________________
DON'T DESPAIR |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wouldn't matter.
Frank Sinatra In Hollywood 1943–1949 was the title of the 1969 LP which Larry and I mentioned above, and which Rich was talking about.BTW, it contained all Columbia studio recordings (including some rare alt. takes)—not the film versions such as are in Chuck's Frank Sinatra In Hollywood (1940-1964) box set. |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
FRANK SINATRA IN HOLLYWOOD 1943-1949 (Columbia LP) 1969
![]() FRANK SINATRA IN HOLLYWOOD 1943-1949 Compilation LP Columbia Records (CBS Inc.) CL 2913 March 24, 1969 16 Tracks Cover montage of movie stills by John Berg Notes by Miles Kreuger SIDE A
|
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
FRANK SINATRA IN HOLLYWOOD 1943-1949 (Columbia LP) 1969
I don't see a better place for this comment, but I just picked up this album. Is it just me or do these tracks sound slightly speeded up, like they increased the speed to cram more onto this set? I know all these recordings, and I think they sound fast here.
__________________
Not now Moose, I'll tell you when. |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|