View Site Map

One For The Home Team

   


Supreme Court Sides with Heirs of Three Stooges

By Sarah Tippit

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Andy Warhol sold prints made
from movie star photographs -- so it never occurred to
veteran portrait artist Gary Saderup that when he sold
drawings of the Three Stooges on T-shirts that he was
breaking the law.

However on Monday no less an authority than the U.S.
Supreme Court said he was.

The court, without comment, sided with the heirs of Larry,
Moe and Curly -- played by several different actors over
the years -- in a dispute with the Los Angeles artist over
his lithographs and T-shirts bearing realistic drawings of
the wacky trio that first became famous in the 1920s.

The justices let stand a California Supreme Court ruling that
an artist must get approval and pay licensing fees to depict
a celebrity -- even if he has been dead for decades -- unless
the new work contains "significant creative elements."

When celebrity drawings are too realistic and are sold
without permission, the California court ruled they violate
heirs' rights to share in profits under the state's right of
publicity laws.

While attorneys for the Stooges' heirs said on Monday they
were thrilled with the decision, attorneys for Saderup said
the decision could have grave implications not only for the
First Amendment rights of artists who draw celebrities but
also for celebrity photographers and celebrity impersonators.

"It's unfortunate," said Stephen Burnett, lead counsel
for Saderup. "There's now a taboo for artists and
photographers. They are now on notice that they better
not depict any celebrity or dead celebrity unless it's a
politician or someone else who has news value." He added
the ruling leaves it up to judges to decide what is and isn't
a legitimate work of art.

Posted by: Nancy | Jan 7, 2002 3:49 PM | plus-minusComments(0)


Enter comment for 'One For The Home Team'

You must be logged in to the Sinatra Family Forum to post a comment.

Frank And New York

   

Times Square rings in 2002, NY remembers Sept. 11
By Grant McCool

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Hundreds of thousands of
people celebrated wildly in Times Square at midnight,
hoping to banish the painful memories of the Sept. 11
attacks with a roaring, glittering, patriotic party to ring
in the New Year.

The crowds, gathered under the tightest security in
the 97-year history of New Year's Eve celebrations in
New York, roared in deafening unison the count down
to 2002 as a glittering crystal ball dropped slowly from
the flagpole at One Times Square amid the blinking and
cascading neon lights of "The Crossroads of the World."

"This city is just tremendously strong," said Mike Alias,
of Brooklyn. "The thought that there would be some sort
of terrorism here almost made me want to come here
more. There's a lot of defiance."

In a display of patriotism, thousands waved U.S. flags
and red, white and blue streamers. The crowds sang
"God Bless America" and "America the Beautiful." At
the stroke of midnight, confetti rained down over the
square, flashbulbs popped from cameras recording the
first moments of 2002, and the Frank Sinatra hit "New
York, New York" blared from loudspeakers.


IT BECOMES MORE AND MORE OBVIOUS THAT DAD'S STATUE BELONGS IN TIMES SQUARE.

Posted by: Nancy | Jan 2, 2002 11:29 AM | plus-minusComments(10)


Enter comment for 'Frank And New York'

You must be logged in to the Sinatra Family Forum to post a comment.


Responses to 'Frank And New York'

Clivey says:
Jan 2, 2002 1:30 PM
Happy New Year Nancy!

Keep up the good work!

Love
Clive in England.

Fred L. says:
Jan 2, 2002 2:07 PM
Nancy, to millions of people through-out the world, Frank Sinatra is New York. It was very appropriate for his song to played. Nancy, please do not lose heart. There are countless numbers in your corner when it comes to the subject of placing a statue of your father in that city. Best wishes for a happy and healthy new year. Best regards, Fred L.

Lourdes Correa says:
Jan 3, 2002 10:36 AM
Nancy, there's no doubt that New York is Frank Sinatra.

Love,

Lourdes

Barry says:
Jan 3, 2002 11:32 AM
Hi Nancy.
When the world finally settles down and thinks seriouly about now and the past,
it will realise that Frank was THE MAJOR influencial figure, world wide, for several hundred years.
A statue in Times square SHOULD be a forgone conclusion.
Music has power. It gives people hope and strength when in a bad way. Frank
was THE IPITOMY of creating that strength
in people.
He should be remembered for that alone,
without all the rest of his fantastic talents.
Barry.
xxx

Jamie says:
Jan 3, 2002 2:46 PM
Wish I could have been there....

Jake says:
Jan 5, 2002 1:23 AM
Nancy, we mentioned the very same thing last year, when we said that after the "Auld Lang Syne" we normally hear "New York, New York" in Times Square. Last year for the opening of the millenium "New York New York" was second only to the before mentioned song... I saw it on TV. It's so obvious Frank has to be there in the form of a statue, so this project has to go through.

Charles St. says:
Jan 5, 2002 12:11 PM
A statue of Frank Sinatra in New York? It would have to be as large as Lady Liberty!

S V PELUZIO JR says:
Jan 9, 2002 4:02 PM
It was very emotive to see and hear Frank Sinatra's sucess, on TV, "New York New York" on New Year's Eve celebrations in
New York.
Frank's voice brought strength to U.S.

ELIZABETH says:
Feb 12, 2002 7:24 PM
Dear Nancy,

I agree with You, wholeheartedly! Please let us know if and when another letter writing campaign will be effective. Please also let us know if we can help in any other ways as well.

Savatri says:
Mar 27, 2002 9:04 AM
You've got that right, Charles St. Well, maybe an inch shorter.


Frank Jr's Calendar Nancy's Calendar Nancy's Calendar Frank Jr's Calendar